Tags:
Depends on what size crank your throwing. I recently got the Phenix Ultra MBX Casting X-12 Rod, its a 7'6" rod and I personally think its the best rod crankin rod Ive used. It can throw cranks as small as the speed trap up to the DD Little John no problem. I recently used it with a Bommer 7A over a three day tourney on Banks and think it performed very well.
Doybn's 704CB.....Best crank rod I've had. I also have a Lamiglass but the Dobyn's is the one I prefer.
My views on crankbait rods may differ from those of a lot of other people, but I am convinced that my views are worth considering no matter what brand of rod you choose for crankbaits.
Based on your statement that you liked your previous rod because "it was light, had a soft tip and strong backbone", my recommendation on a crankbait rod may not work for you. Conversely, the advice you get from others touting their "brand" and why it is the best may work for you, but would not be close to what I consider to be the "best" crankbait rod choice.
To me, the BEST choice is the rod that puts more bass in my livewell, and also gives me the best chance of landing the bass of a lifetime. In other words, my primary choice in my priority list of features is how well the rod increases my chances of catching (hooking and landing) both my biggest bass ever and the most bass.
Lightweight, comfort, etc. means nothing to me if I have to sacrifice size or numbers of bass landed. Yes, the rod has to be at least comfortable enough to want to use it all day, but shaving a few fractions of an ounce of weight is unwise if it comes at the expense of hurting my success rate.
Crankbaits have a basic problem; i.e. they use treble hooks. Treble hooks are easyfor a bass to throw, particularly when bass jump or when you have to change your rod angle and direction when playing a bass. Because of this fact, a crankbait rod has to compensate for this weakness to minimize the frequency of poorly hooked bass, and being able to throw the lure once hooked.
Fiberglass is the best material available to date since it can be formed into a rod that has an evenly parabolic bend, and a slow recovery speed; both my primary wants in any rod that uses lures with treble hooks. Sure, some manufacturers can taper graphite or boron to produce parabolic bends, but these tapers will likely break if the bend is sufficient to work properly, and no matter how they taper the blank it will always have too fast of a recovery rate to be optimal.
To understand what I am talking about in "recovery rate or speed", imagine bending the tip of your rod down to a specific point, and then letting it go. The speed the rod returns to the straight condition is it's recovery speed. Fast is not good when trying to land a big bass that is shaking its head or jumping with a heavy crankbait using treble hooks. That shaking and jumping and a graphite rod's recovery speed guarantees some slack in your line, and extra tearing of the flesh by the hook due to uneven pressure, and results in more lost fish.
A graphite rod will certainly be lighter, and more enjoyable to use all day long, and may give one more "fishing" pleasure, but it will NOT give one more "catching" pleasure. Yes, it is my personal and strong opinion; you make your own decision and choice.
Composite rods are not a "best of all worlds", but rather a compromise. They are marketed to those who want features like you desire, but they do not work as well as a properly designed all glass rod. Manufacturers make them because people want and buy them, and selling rods is their business.
All glass rods that are properly tapered are both durable and flexible. They are also heavier in total weight, and appear even heavier (perception is many people's reality) because the blank's diameter is bigger. That being said, there are lighter variations or blend's of fiberglass (like "S" glass vs. "E" glass cloth material). Most glass rods use E Glass because it is more readily available and less expensive than S glass.
My personal favorite glass rod is no longer in production; it is the Lamiglas SPC 703, which used an "S" glass blank. The reason it became discontinued was because the S glass made the rod more expensive, and anglers didn't understand the cost/benefit ratio and didn't want to spend the extra money. Since then Lamiglas has made their current glass model as close to the SPC 703 as possible using E Glass (same glass as other rod manufacturer's), just to keep it competitive in price with other manufacturers.
You won't likely find one of the discontinued Lamiglas models, because I (and several others) have bought every single one available from all the stores on the west coast. For years we have begged Lamiglas to resurrect this model, but the problem has been the source of quality S Glass cloth material from Corning has been limited to huge quantities that could not be justified in rod sales. We continue to be hopeful that Lamiglas will bring this rod back, and with modern handles and guide placement.
Sorry for the dissertation, and for not giving you a simple rod model choice, but there is much more to a good crankbait rod than lightweight and soft tip; and a strong backbone is a guarantee to lost fish.
That is my story, and I'm sticking to it.
ciao,
Marc Marcantonio
Thanks Marc that was some solid info! I used to have a great 7 1/2ft fiberglass crankin stick but once I started throwing those big one ounce deep divers that rod just didnt have the nuts to fish those plugs. I changed to a nice composite with a soft tip and good backbone and throwing those big cranks is now a breeze. I havent had any issues with lossing fish yet. What are your thoughts on those fiberglass rods and throwing those big cranks?
Thanks Marc that was some solid info! I used to have a great 7 1/2ft fiberglass crankin stick but once I started throwing those big one ounce deep divers that rod just didnt have the nuts to fish those plugs. I changed to a nice composite with a soft tip and good backbone and throwing those big cranks is now a breeze. I havent had any issues with lossing fish yet. What are your thoughts on those fiberglass rods and throwing those big cranks?
Thank for all of the reply. Marc that was some great info. I think I might try to look for a use that S-glass Lama rod, if I can find it. I was thinking maybe I would go with a fiber glass or composite for deep crank and graphite for shallow. How does that sound.
Posted by Tom Melowitz on September 7, 2019 at 2:45pm
Posted by Eric Urstad on April 3, 2019 at 7:38pm
© 2024 Created by Jordan Doucet. Powered by